Justifying Violence Attitudes of Americans (ICPSR)

by Monica D. Blumenthal

Publisher: Univ of Michigan Survey Research

Written in English
Cover of: Justifying Violence Attitudes of Americans (ICPSR) | Monica D. Blumenthal
Published: Downloads: 642
Share This

Subjects:

  • Germany (West),
  • Political parties,
  • Public opinion,
  • Elections
The Physical Object
FormatPaperback
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL8228063M
ISBN 100891389954
ISBN 109780891389958

Participants were Black Americans who completed an online survey. Among Black men, we found that greater objectifying behaviors and greater endorsement of the Jezebel stereotype were associated with greater justification of violence toward women. We did not find evidence of an interaction between these two : Thekia Cheeseborough, Nicole Overstreet, L. Monique Ward.   7 Keys to Understanding Violence in the Book of Joshua. By Lawson Stone - September 2, 9. Share on Facebook. So if a modern reader wanted to justify violence from Joshua, they’d have to set aside strategies, weapons and training and expect miraculous victories! It begins to look like the author of Joshua doesn’t give us a very. This article deals with the juxtaposition of Judaic law and theology to violence and non-violence by groups and individuals. Attitudes and laws towards both peace and violence exist within the Jewish tradition. Throughout history, Judaism's religious texts or precepts have been used to promote as well as oppose violence. contribution of the Bible to violence in the world is to show that such certitude is an illusion. (33) Does the Bible justify violence? The an-swer is yes and no. Yes, it does, because un-deniably violence and wars were recorded in the Bible and many of them were waged in the name of God. No, it doesn’t, because of the questionable nature of File Size: 70KB.

  Muslim Americans even more likely than general public to say targeting and killing civilians is never justified. In an attempt to gauge views about violence against civilians – not only among Muslims, but also among Americans overall – Pew Research Center asked a Author: Shannon Greenwood. Changing cultural and social norms that support violence Series of briefings on violence prevention This briefing for advocates, programme designers and implementers and others is one of a seven-part series on the evidence for interventions to prevent interpersonal and self-directed violence. Behind the common question lies a morass of unclear thinking. William T. Cavanaugh Everyone knows that religion has a dangerous tendency to promote violence. This story is part of the conventional wisdom of Western societies, and it underlies many of our institutions and policies, from limits on the public role of religion to efforts to promote democracy in the Middle East.   In many countries, more than a third of women think a husband is sometimes justified in beating his wife. Researchers say this attitude contributes to the high rate of domestic violence .

The Philosophy of Colonialism: Civilization, Christianity, and Commerce Overview As the imperial powers of Europe set their sights on new geographic regions to expand their spheres of influence in the 19 th century, Africa emerged as a prime location for colonization due to its wealth of natural resources and purportedly undeveloped economies.   The American Revolution: A History of Violence. American audiences prefer to imagine the nation’s birth pangs as a series of dexterous verbal battles played out more or .   Young Americans are about equally favorable toward socialism (50%) and capitalism (49%). In stark contrast, Americans 65 and over solidly prefer capitalism (76%) to socialism (34%). It is not out of line to blame our education system for pushing socialism and leftist professors who promote violence for these attitudes.   PRINCETON, NJ -- The death of year-old African-American Michael Brown at the hands of a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, has reopened the subject of black Americans' relationship with the police, and more generally the differences in the way blacks and whites look at the criminal justice and civil rights situations in the U.S.

Justifying Violence Attitudes of Americans (ICPSR) by Monica D. Blumenthal Download PDF EPUB FB2

Justifying Violence: Attitudes of American Men by Monica D. Blumenthal (Author) ISBN ISBN Why is ISBN important. ISBN. This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book Cited by: Justifying violence: attitudes of American men.

[Monica D Blumenthal;] -- In this book the authors present the results of their study into American male acceptance of violence.

The authors discuss when interviewees deemed violence acceptable, what they defined as violence. Justifying violence: attitudes of American men, Monica D. Blumenthal, Robert Louis Kahn, Frank M. Andrews, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, - Social Science - pages.

Get this from a library. Justifying violence: attitudes of American men. [Monica D Blumenthal; Robert L Kahn; Frank M Andrews; Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.;]. Stanley Presser, "Justifying Violence: Attitudes of American Men.

Monica D. Blumenthal, Robert L. Kahn, Frank M. Andrews, Kendra B. Head," American Journal of. Justifying violence: attitudes of American men [by] Monica D.

Blumenthal [and others] Format Book Published Ann Arbor, Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan [] Description xii, p. illus. 23 cm. Other contributors Blumenthal, Monica D. Notes. Justifying Revolution: Law, Wirtue, and Violence in the American War for Independence is published by Oklahoma University Press.

It is edited by Glenn A. Moots and Phillip Hamilton. Contributing scholars provide 13 essays that examine the war in light of the just war theory, which has not been the focus of any previous study exclusively.5/5(1).

Summary View help for Summary. This study contains data on the attitudes of 1, American men aged toward violence in The study was undertaken to examine the levels of violence that can be viewed as justified to bring about social control or social change.

♥ Book Title: Justifying Revolution ♣ Name Author: Glenn A. Moots ∞ Launching: Info ISBN Link: ⊗ Detail ISBN code: ⊕ Number Pages: Total sheet ♮ News id: y8ddDwAAQBAJ Download File Start Reading ☯ Full Synopsis: "The American imagination still exalts the Founders as the prime movers of the Revolution, and the War of Independence has.

Attitudes, Values and Beliefs about Violence within Families Survey Findings Prepared by Fleur McLaren being talked about and also felt the campaign had affirmed or changed their own beliefs about violence within families. justify violence against their family (Chamberland et al ).

Summary View help for Summary. This survey of attitudes of 1, American men aged toward violence was conducted in the summer of by the Survey Research Center of the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. Justifying Revolution: Law, Wirtue, and Violence in the American War for Independence is published by Oklahoma University Press.

It is edited by Glenn A. Moots and Phillip Hamilton. Contributing scholars provide 13 essays that examine the war in light of the just war theory, which has not been the focus of any previous study exclusively.5/5. To cite this article: Monica M. Gerber & Jonathan Jackson () Justifying violence: legitimacy, ideology and public support for police use of force, Psychology, Crime & Law, DOI.

Buy More About Justifying Violence: Methodological Studies of Attitudes and Behavior by Blumenthal, Monica D. (ISBN: ) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low Author: Monica D. Blumenthal. Book Review: Justifying Revolution: Law, Virtue, and Violence in the American War for Independence, Glenn A.

Moots and Phillip Hamilton, eds. (University of Oklahoma Press, ) BUY THIS BOOK FROM AMAZON. For many, the story of the American Revolution is simple and straightforward: in an effort to break the chains of tyranny and unrepresentative tax schemes, American 9/ Other studies show that gender equality attitudes predict attitudes toward violence against women (Pavlou & Knowles, ;ViCHealth, ).

Similar findings were found in Vietnam (Krause, Gordon. The pooled prevalence of women's attitude towards justifying domestic violence was found to be 57% (95% CI; %%). Reasons for justifying were: burning food, argues with husband, goes out without telling, neglects children, refuses sex, unfaithful, disobeys and suspects infidelity.

: Yonas Deressa Guracho, Berhanu Boru Bifftu. Exposure to domestic violence as well as caregivers' psychological aggression (eg, insults, yelling) and physical violence toward children are risk factors for children's mental health problems, physical injuries, and even death.

1 Domestic violence and child abuse are public health problems often encountered by pediatricians. 2 The American Academy of Pediatrics has addressed both of these Cited by: Justifying Violence: Attitudes of American Men  Blumenthal, Monica D.

() Related Items in Google Scholar ©— Bioethics Research Library Box Washington DC Search DigitalGeorgetown. This Collection. Browse. Free Online Library: Justifying violence: Boiardo's Castle Cruel. (Matteo Maria Boiardo) by "Philological Quarterly"; Literature, writing, book reviews Languages and linguistics Cruelty Social aspects Humanism Portrayals Justice Beliefs, opinions and attitudes.

More about justifying violence: Methodological studies of attitudes and behavior. Blumenthal, Monica D; Chadiha, Letha B; Cole, Gerald A; Jayaratne, Toby E More about justifying violence: Methodological studies of attitudes and behavior.

Blumenthal, Monica D; Chadiha, Book. Show full item record View/ by: 9. Exposure to domestic violence as well as caregivers’ psychological aggression (e.g., insults, yelling) and physical violence toward children are risk factors for children’s mental health problems, physical injuries, and even death.

1 Domestic violence and child abuse are public health problems often encountered by pediatricians. 2 The American Academy of Pediatrics has addressed both of Cited by:   Justifying Revolution: Law, Virtue, and Violence in the American War of Independence (Political Violence in North America) by Glenn A.

Moots book review. Click to read the full review of Justifying Revolution: Law, Virtue, and Violence in the American War of Independence (Political Violence in North America) in New York Journal of Books. Review written by Jerry Lenaburg. The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God.

Most contemporary Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book's call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence. Attitude toward intimate partner violence has been demonstrated as one of the prominent predictors of IPV (Gage and Hutchinson,Jewkes et al., ).

Studies showed that there was a close relationship between individual's attitude toward intimate partner violence and the actual occurrence of spouse abuse (Doe,Straus, ).Cited by: The American fascination with violence is not only focused on violent heroes, however.

Victims of violence, displayed in newspapers and on television news, bring to life another part of the discourse: fear. Fear of an enemy helps to justify more violence. An armed citizenry stands ready to attack, but cannot agree on the identity of the by: 7. In a more audacious version of the justification of violence in the name of self-defense, violence of any kind may be justified in reply to the violence of any other kind, provided there is a somewhat fair use of the violence exercised init may even be appropriate to respond to mobbing by using physical violence, provided the violence does not exceed that which seems a fair Author: Andrea Borghini.

Gallup analysis suggests that one's religious identity and level of devotion have little to do with one's views about targeting civilians. According to the largest global study of its kind, covering countries, it is human development and governance — not piety or culture — that are the strongest factors in explaining differences in how the public perceives this type of violence.

Attitudes toward intimate partner violence (IPV) are known predictors of IPV victimization and perpetration with more women generally believed to justify IPV than men. An understanding of the determinants of justification of IPV may provide information necessary for holistic by: Law, Virtue, and Violence in the American War of Independence.

Edited by Glenn A form the first sustained exploration of Americans’ and Britons’ use of just war theory as they battled over American independence. Justifying Revolution raises important questions about the Reviews of New Books.

Volume 1 in Political Violence in North. ANN ARBOR—Global attitudes about domestic violence have changed dramatically sinceaccording to a new University of Michigan study that analyzes data from 26 low- and middle-income countries. Nigeria had the largest change, with 65 percent of men and 52 percent of women rejecting domestic violence incompared with 48 percent and.

Attitudes justifying domestic violence predict endorsement of corporal punishment and physical and psychological aggression towards children: A study in 25 low- and middle-income countries Jennifer E.

Lansford, Kirby Deater-Deckard, Marc H. Bornstein, Diane L. Putnick, Robert BradleyCited by: Christians have held diverse views towards violence and non-violence through time. Currently and historically there have been four views and practices within Christianity toward violence and war: non-resistance, Christian pacifism, just war, and preventive war (Holy war, e.g., the Crusades).

The early church in the Roman empire adopted a nonviolent stance when it came to war since imitating.